Indiana joins multi-state lawsuit seeking to halt federal nursing home staffing rule
Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
A lawsuit filed Tuesday by 20 states challenging a federal rule mandating higher staffing levels in nursing homes alleges that facilities will be forced to close.
The states are led by Republican attorneys general, including Indiana’s Todd Rokita. The named defendants include leaders within the federal Health and Human Services agency as well as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
“Although the nursing home industry certainly has had its share of challenges, it fills a vital need in our communities that cannot be replaced,” the 66-page filing read. “Instead of addressing the legitimate challenges nursing homes face, the Defendants put forward a heavy-handed mandate … This Final Rule poses an existential threat to the nursing home industry as many nursing homes that are struggling will have no choice but to go out of business.”
The Health and Human Services agency’s new requirement would create a nationwide standard for staffing nursing homes. It comes in the wake of COVID-19, which put a spotlight on the institutional setting. Due to the congregational nature of long-term care facilities and the poor overall health of residents, such places saw high infections and deaths throughout the pandemic that may have been exacerbated by low staffing levels.
Such a focus prompted overseeing government agencies to increase staffing levels to better respond to health and safety concerns from residents, many of whom continue to report issues related to poor staffing.
Most of the nation’s nursing homes would fail to meet the finalized April rule, which included requirements like having a registered nurse onsite 24/7, having residents receive at least .55 hours of care from a registered nurse each day and having residents receive 2.45 hours of care from a nursing aide daily.
Currently, registered nurses only need to be at a facility for eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week.
States would also need to collect additional information related to staff compensation.
Difficult for nursing homes to implement
Nurses and other health care professionals have been slow to return to the long-term care workforce, which was the last to recover from COVID-19 losses, and the nursing home lobbying industry has fiercely opposed the proposed rule. Some families and residents, on the other hand, say the rule doesn’t go far enough.
The first phase of the rule, which included staffing assessment requirements and not the minimum staffing hours, went into effect on Aug. 8. The minimum staffing hours would go into effect in May 2027, as detailed in a KFF analysis, which found that 19% of facilities would meet the new standards.
Tuesday’s lawsuit claimed that an outside study found nursing homes would need to hire more than 100,000 full-time employees at a cost of roughly $6.8 billion per year. It continued to say that 94% of such long-term care settings would fail to meet at least one of the three requirements, risking the care of hundreds of thousands of residents.
Attorneys general for the states, joined by lobbying organizations as plaintiffs, allege the federal agencies overstepped their authority to institute the new rule — adding that the former staffing standard was set by Congress.
Specific harm to states could include higher nursing home costs, which are primarily paid by state and federal governments through Medicaid since Medicare and many private insurers don’t cover such care or only do so in a limited capacity. Facility costs in Indiana could climb by $10.9 million if required to have a registered nurse onsite 24/7, according to CMS estimates, and complying with all the rules could cost as much as $151.2 million.
The Indiana Capital Chronicle is an independent, not-for-profit news organization that covers state government, policy and elections.